Google is giving employees a choice between Mac or PC/Linux — the reason apparently isn’t cost, but security. Google still has a bitter taste in their mouth since the Chinese Government snuck their way into computers through a flaw in Internet Explorer 6, and gained access to really sensitive information.

Though their cited reason is security, I’m also betting there were some other reasons discussed before the decision was made. Some of the actual reasons behind the move probably included:

1) Security
2) Dogfooding Chrome OS
3) Money Savings
4) Stick it to Microsoft
5) Press

Security
Yes, even though it’s probably not really their primary reason, security is a real issue at Google. As long as people are using Windows inside the company, there are going to be some employees using IE 6 — not exactly a good idea today. Also, since Microsoft Windows is the #1 desktop operating system, malware naturally targets it. It’s true that other operating systems have viruses too (like Mac OS), but there are less.

Dogfood Chrome OS
As the fall gets closer, Google needs to start using their own operating system in-house — what they call dogfooding. Without months of real-life use of Chrome OS, the release will not be as smooth as it could be.

Money Savings
There is lots of money to be saved by ditching Windows. Those licensing costs are likely absolutely sickening for anyone looking over expenses. Moving away from Windows is actually more feasible for Google than most software development companies — they are not dependent on Microsoft Visual Studio to do their development work. Everything they do is web-based (using Java or Python) — both of which ca be developed really easily using MacOS and Linux.

Stick it to Microsoft
For every license they don’t purchase, Microsoft loses money. Not only will they lose 20,000+ licenses for Windows at Google, other companies will take a look at this and possibly consider doing the same thing at their companies. Most won’t bite, but there will definitely be a handful — and it adds up quick.

Press
A statement like this is big news, and easy press. Yes, I’m guilty!

Let’s hear your take on the situation in the Talk Back!

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland. Pic: Ray Strange Source: The Australian

THE federal government has briefed the Australian Federal Police in relation to an investigation into Google after revelations that staff working for the global search engine accessed private information of home owners on unsecured wireless networks while mapping suburban streets.

Australia is the second jurisdiction where Google’s alleged breach of privacy has been referred to police.

In Germany, where operators of Google’s Street View cars were discovered accessing private information, the case against Google is in the hands of prosecutors.

Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland said yesterday the AFP would examine whether Google’s access of the information had breached the Telecommunications Interception Act, which prohibits the access of electronic communications other than for authorised purposes.

Under the act, serious offences are punishable by three years’ jail.

“There have been some complaints voiced . . . by the public in respect to practices that have been reported involving allegations that some information may have been obtained by staff of Google travelling around the streets,” Mr McClelland said.

“Obviously these things require investigation . . . but on Friday the Attorney-General’s Department did refer those allegations and those reports to the Australian Federal Police for further investigation.”

The government’s hardline response follows a clash with Google and other search engines over its plans to introduce internet filters blocking child pornography and other material banned from broadcast and publication.

It also comes amid a powerful backlash by Western governments against Google, which admitted “We screwed up” by allowing what it says was an inadvertent breach of privacy.

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding has described Google as a company that “does not respect EU rules”.

Austria has banned Google Street View cars from its streets. The cars are also off the road in Australia.

Australia’s Privacy Commissioner is preparing a report into the breach.

Suits have been filed in Washington D.C., California, Massachusetts and Oregon by people who accuse Google of violating their privacy because the cars also collected data from open Wi-Fi networks.

A U.S. District Court in Portland, Oregon, on Monday ordered Google to make two copies of a hard drive containing data from the United States and turn them over to the court.

Google declined to comment on the lawsuits. It opted last week to retain the data while different jurisdictions figure out what they want done with it.

Google has sent fleets of cars around the world for several years to take panoramic pictures of streets. People using Google’s online atlas for locations and directions can often look at photographs collected by the Street View project and classified by address.

Google says it uses the location of Wi-Fi networks to enhance location-based services on smartphones.

It first revealed that Street View cars were collecting wireless data in April, but said that no personal data from Wi-Fi networks was involved. But after an audit requested by Germany, Google acknowledged it had been mistakenly collecting samples of “payload data.”

A lawsuit filed on Wednesday by Washington D.C. resident Jeffrey Colman charged that “Google was surreptitiously collecting private information, which, on information and belief, included e-mails, video, audio and other payload data belonging to users and operators of home-based Wi-Fi Networks.”

Three U.S. lawmakers, concerned Google may have violated U.S. privacy laws, asked the company on Wednesday to tell them how much personal data was gathered.

California Republican Representative Joe Barton, California Democrat Henry Waxman and Massachusetts Democrat Edward Markey said in a letter to Google’s Chief Executive Eric Schmidt that they also wanted to know how Google planned to use that information.

The Federal Trade Commission has an informal probe underway, its Chairman Jon Leibowitz has told lawmakers. (Reporting by Diane Bartz; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Google has missed a deadline with regulators in Germany to hand over personal data it collected over WiFi networks as part of its Street View scheme.

The delay means Google could face a fine of hundreds of thousands of euros, and comes as it faces increasing pressure from regulators globally for its unauthorised accumulation of 600GB of personal data.

The data protection authority in Hamburg had asked Google to submit the original hard drives containing the “payload” data – such as e-mails or fragments of web pages being visited by individuals using unsecured wireless networks – by midnight on Wednesday.

Hamburg’s initial request to audit the data collected for Street View, which allows users to see detailed photos of cities around the world, prompted Google’s admission two weeks ago that it had “mistakenly” collected personal information.

Prosecutors there are investigating what they call an “unauthorised interception of data”.

The Hamburg information commissioner also demanded access to one of the cars used to capture photos and other information for Google’s Street View, with which Google has complied.

But Google has asked for more time to consider the legal ramifications of sharing private data with the regulator after being advised that doing so could break German communications law.

“We want to co-operate with [the Hamburg information commissioner's] requests … but as granting access to payload data creates legal challenges in Germany which we need to review, we are continuing to discuss the appropriate legal and logistical process for making the data available,” Google said. “We hope, given more time, to be able to resolve this difficult issue.”

Google admitted that it could face a similar conflict between civil investigators and criminal prosecutors in other countries.

Prof Dr Johannes Caspar, Hamburg’s data protection commissioner, said he did not accept Google’s argument. He said in a statement that the search company would not face criminal action by handing over the hard drive.

Earlier reports in Germany suggested that Prof Caspar could fine Google €300,000 ($367,000) for missing the deadline.

But some privacy campaigners sided with Google. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a US-based digital privacy campaigner, which slammed Google as “too mature to be making these kinds of rookie privacy mistakes”, shared the company’s concerns about further exposing private information.

“Calls from some quarters for Google to turn over the data to the US or other governments are wrong-headed,” EFF said last week . “To allow a government to investigate a privacy breach by further violating privacy is senseless.”

Google last week stopped the global deletion of private WiFi data it has collected following confusion over what it should do with the material. Although it has deleted the data it collected in Ireland, it halted plans to dispose of the information in the UK after a complaint from Privacy International that such a move would constitute destruction of evidence.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.